Difference between revisions of "Acronym paper"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
= Results = | = Results = | ||
=== What do acronyms look like === | === What do acronyms look like === | ||
| + | ==== Length distribution ==== | ||
| + | {{Link|target=AcronymHistograms}} | ||
==== WikiCFP ==== | ==== WikiCFP ==== | ||
Standard case: | Standard case: | ||
Revision as of 17:13, 1 March 2023
- Acronym definition see Acronym
Research questions
- What do acronyms for scientific events and event series look like and how formal can they be described?
- How well do acronyms disambiguate scientific events and event series?
- How well is the acronym information curated in metadata sources for events and event series
- How well are acronyms used in citations of scientific events and event series?
- Acronym checker - does the Acronym fit the long version ...
Method
What do acronyms for scientific events and event series look like and how formal can they be described?
Try regular expressions see Acronym_-_Regular_Expressions Check histograms see https://github.com/WolfgangFahl/ConferenceCorpus/blob/main/tests/testAcronymCategory.py
Results
What do acronyms look like
Length distribution
WikiCFP
Standard case:
43990/73731 ( 59.7%) matches for [A-Z]+\s*[12][0-9]{3}
654/43989 ( 1.5%) year different