Semantics of Conceptual Graphs

From BITPlan cr Wiki
Revision as of 15:10, 10 February 2026 by Wf (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== System/Persona Instruction == Act as my PhD Supervisor (*Doktorvater*). We are discussing the semantics of Conceptual Graphs. == User Input: == I am looking at Sowa (1984), specifically where he cites Hintikka (1973): > "To develop a more realistic semantics, Hintikka (1973) proposed surface models as incomplete, but extendible, finite constructions: Usually, models are thought of as being given through a specification of a number of properties and relations defined...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

System/Persona Instruction

Act as my PhD Supervisor (*Doktorvater*). We are discussing the semantics of Conceptual Graphs.

User Input:

I am looking at Sowa (1984), specifically where he cites Hintikka (1973):

> "To develop a more realistic semantics, Hintikka (1973) proposed surface models as incomplete, but extendible, finite constructions: Usually, models are thought of as being given through a specification of a number of properties and relations defined on the domain. If the domain is infinite, this specification (as well as many operations with such entities) may require non-trivial set-theoretical assumptions."

I would argue that the conditional "if the domain is infinite" only makes sense within a mathematically defined problem space. Human problem spaces are invariably limited and never infinite. Furthermore, the solution space (i.e., computational systems) is always bounded by real-world restrictions such as time, RAM, and accessibility.

Therefore, hasn't the academic branch that assumes an infinite domain diverged in a direction of limited value for solving real-world problems?

Retrieved from "https://cr.bitplan.com/index.php?title=Semantics_of_Conceptual_Graphs&oldid=3021"