Difference between revisions of "Talk:Learning Approaches For Complex Topics"

From BITPlan cr Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "'''Prompts: ''' ''what scientific papers are related to When explaining complex topics it depends on the target audience which order of presentation will be most effective. St...")
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
''what scientific papers are related to When explaining complex topics it depends on the target audience which order of presentation will be most effective. Starting with the theory in a formalized and abstract way is the preferred approach in scientific circles. To present concrete examples and explain the links between the elements of the examples to the theoretical concepts and vice versa helps clarifying. In paedagogic settings it makes sense to ask the audience for it's preference: Shall the theory be presented first or the example?''
 
''what scientific papers are related to When explaining complex topics it depends on the target audience which order of presentation will be most effective. Starting with the theory in a formalized and abstract way is the preferred approach in scientific circles. To present concrete examples and explain the links between the elements of the examples to the theoretical concepts and vice versa helps clarifying. In paedagogic settings it makes sense to ask the audience for it's preference: Shall the theory be presented first or the example?''
  
i need this as mediawiki markup in sections e.g. with [[CiteRef::pashler2008le]]
+
i need this as mediawiki markup in sections e.g. with <pre>[[CiteRef::pashler2008le]]
 
{{#scite:
 
{{#scite:
 
|reference=pashler2008le
 
|reference=pashler2008le
Line 20: Line 20:
 
|retrieved-on=2024-11-09
 
|retrieved-on=2024-11-09
 
}}
 
}}
 +
</pre>

Latest revision as of 08:14, 9 November 2024

Prompts: what scientific papers are related to When explaining complex topics it depends on the target audience which order of presentation will be most effective. Starting with the theory in a formalized and abstract way is the preferred approach in scientific circles. To present concrete examples and explain the links between the elements of the examples to the theoretical concepts and vice versa helps clarifying. In paedagogic settings it makes sense to ask the audience for it's preference: Shall the theory be presented first or the example?

i need this as mediawiki markup in sections e.g. with

[[CiteRef::pashler2008le]]
{{#scite:
|reference=pashler2008le
|type=journal-article
|title=Learning Styles
|subtitle=Concepts and Evidence
|authors=Harold Pashler;Mark McDaniel;Doug Rohrer;Robert Bjork
|journal=Psychological Science in the Public Interest
|publisher=SAGE Publications
|issn=1529-1006;1539-6053|+sep=;
|volume=9
|pages=105-119
|doi=10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
|year=2008
|retrieved-from=https://doi.org/
|retrieved-on=2024-11-09
}}