Difference between revisions of "Complexity"
(Created page with "A definition for complexity in the context of semantification of workflows is not easy to find or create. "Complexity" is a broad term used in different contexts and needs dis...") |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
So a first step in this train of source is: simple relations have few participants, low transaction costs and high transaction benefits. E.g. buying an ice cream in summer might lead to a good relation to the ice cream vendor if the price is low and the ice most tasty and the ice cream parlor was only a walk away on a hot summer day - you did not have to wait in line and the person selling was kind to you (and of course so have you been). | So a first step in this train of source is: simple relations have few participants, low transaction costs and high transaction benefits. E.g. buying an ice cream in summer might lead to a good relation to the ice cream vendor if the price is low and the ice most tasty and the ice cream parlor was only a walk away on a hot summer day - you did not have to wait in line and the person selling was kind to you (and of course so have you been). | ||
− | Formally ... | + | '''Formally ...''' |
+ | Let's test whether an AI can derive a proper complexity formalization for us ... |
Revision as of 15:59, 30 September 2024
A definition for complexity in the context of semantification of workflows is not easy to find or create. "Complexity" is a broad term used in different contexts and needs disambiguation.
Let's start with a simple naive example: a simple versus a complex relationship. We would assume that simplicity correlates with small size and complexity with large size. The more people (nodes) involved in a relation the more effort it is to keep the state of the network in order. In a knowledgegraph G=(V,E) it might therefore make sense to count the nodes and edges and the depth and breadth of the structure the graph might build (e.g. if it is a tree).
The cost of traversing the network and the benefit of doing so will most likely also influence the complexity.
So a first step in this train of source is: simple relations have few participants, low transaction costs and high transaction benefits. E.g. buying an ice cream in summer might lead to a good relation to the ice cream vendor if the price is low and the ice most tasty and the ice cream parlor was only a walk away on a hot summer day - you did not have to wait in line and the person selling was kind to you (and of course so have you been).
Formally ... Let's test whether an AI can derive a proper complexity formalization for us ...